Until his December 6 declaration recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of the state of Israel, it had become a strange anomaly that among all of the new president’s many policies, it was the Israeli-Palestinian track of the Middle East conflicts that generated the least – virtually no – public outcry. Most simply, it was an affirmation of the unifying – if albeit coincidental — effect that a mandatory mantra [read: “two-state solution] necessarily repeated by all who deem to be taken seriously can have on a policy issue. The incongruity righted itself as sure as a stock market sell-off when President Trump gave voice to what he claimed was merely a reading of existing realities: Jerusalem is the capital of the state of Israel. As is the wont of foreign policy matters, in addition to a divided domestic populace, foreign voices fuel the debate, in this case Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’s counter-declaration ostensibly ending the American ownership of the peace process for lack of honest-broker status while seemingly teasing Europeans from Paris to Moscow about prospects for replacing the US as interlocutor. Those who see President Trump as a businessman reading the realities rather than an ideologue pandering to partisan interests were not surprised by his comments to a right-wing Israeli newspaper on Friday in which he expressed uncertainty with Israel’s desire to make peace. Asked by his Israel Today interviewer when the long-awaited Trump Mideast peace proposal will be released, POTUS replied, “Right now, I would say the Palestinians are not looking to make peace, they are not looking to make peace. And I am not necessarily sure that Israel is looking to make peace. So, we are just going to have to see what happens.”
President Trump: “Not Sure if Israelis want Peace; Palestinians Don’t
Posted By Michael Friedson On In Mideast Daily News
Sign Up for Mideast Daily News
Wake up to the Trusted Mideast News source
By subscribing, you agree to The Media Line terms of use and privacy policy.