Iran’s Ambitions Are Territorial, Not Ideological

The Media Line Staff

08/07/2024

Al Qabas, Kuwait, July 11

“Our disagreements with the United States primarily hinge on Iran’s role in the Middle East,” declared the Iranian foreign minister, Ali Bagheri. This statement, straightforward and unambiguous, signals Iran’s unyielding ambitions in the region. For the Gulf countries, it serves as a stark warning. This declaration clarifies that the crux of US-Iranian discord is not ideological but territorial—centered on Iran’s expansionist aims. It also subtly suggests that the US does not fundamentally oppose Iran’s regional pursuits but is wary of their scope, particularly when American interests are at stake. Despite historical tensions, especially during the post-1979 Iranian Revolution, diplomatic ties between Iran and the US were never completely severed. Contrary to public rhetoric, including Iran’s notorious branding of the US as the “Great Satan,” economic exchanges, particularly oil trade, persisted even during the hostage crisis at the US embassy in Tehran. American products continued to flow into Iranian markets. Secret diplomatic talks never ceased, and one notable outcome was the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal, which surprised many Gulf states. Iran’s dealings with Israel, though shrouded in public animosity, reveal a different narrative. Trita Parsi, an Iranian-American writer and professor at Johns Hopkins University, in his book Treacherous Alliance, unveils the covert collaborations between Israel, Iran, and the US. In his book, Parsi outlines how these countries maintain a strategic, rather than ideological, rivalry primarily concerned with regional dominance. The book documents numerous clandestine meetings in various European capitals aimed at brokering a comprehensive agreement that serves the interests of all three nations. It also provides insights into the proposals and concessions made by Iran to the US, mediated by Switzerland in 2003, to resolve ongoing disputes. The Iranian foreign minister’s recent statement reinforces the need for the Gulf countries to brace for future geopolitical maneuvers by Iran. It’s a reminder that, while public narratives may differ, underlying strategic interests often guide international relations. Vigilance and preparedness are imperative for the Gulf nations in responding to these evolving dynamics. Ultimately, divine protection is sought, but astute political foresight and action remain crucial. –Faisal Mohammad bin Sabt (translated by Asaf Zilberfarb)